I Deserve an Oscar for Pretending to Be Straight for All Those Years
The portrayal of LGBTQ+ characters on television has evolved significantly over the years, from the early days of stereotypical gay best friend roles to more nuanced and diverse representations. In the 1990s, when LGBTQ+ visibility on TV began to grow, straight actors often portrayed queer characters. And while we've seen a rise in openly gay characters and performers in recent years, straight actors still frequently take on gay roles.
This ongoing trend has sparked debate within both the queer community and the broader public, with some arguing that only queer actors should be cast in queer roles, while others remain indifferent or even supportive of the practice. The question of whether straight actors should continue to play gay characters remains a complex and divisive issue.
The Challenge of Straight Actors Playing Gay Roles
In an ideal world of true equality, the casting of straight actors in gay roles wouldn’t raise any concerns. However, we don’t live in such a world. While there has been progress for LGBTQ+ rights, the reality is that discrimination and harm still exist. Anti-LGBTQ+ legislation is on the rise, and safe spaces for the community continue to be targeted by hate. In this context, the casting of straight actors in gay roles takes on more significance.
On the surface, the casting of a straight actor in a queer role might seem like a step forward. After all, LGBTQ+ representation in media is important, and even a straight actor portraying a gay character can feel like progress. But when viewed through the lens of the broader challenges facing the queer community, it becomes more complicated. Straight actors stepping into gay roles often do so as a departure from their usual on-screen personas, whereas gay actors are often typecast into limited, stereotypical gay roles. This perpetuates the idea that a gay actor can only play a gay character, further limiting their opportunities.
For instance, while Matt Bomer's portrayal of a straight husband in Echoes is a great example of breaking typecasting, he is "straight-passing"—which makes it easier for him to land such roles. For many gay actors, the opportunity to play diverse roles, beyond the gay character, is often out of reach.
Additionally, when straight actors do take on queer roles, there’s a risk of leaning into outdated stereotypes or portraying the character in a campy, comedic light. A prime example of this dynamic can be seen in Ewan McGregor’s portrayal of the iconic gay designer Roy Halston in the 2021 Netflix series Halston. Halston was a real person, and his authentic life and flamboyant persona offered McGregor plenty of material to reference and model his character.
However, this role feels like a missed opportunity for a gay actor—someone who, despite being talented, may be considered "too gay" by Hollywood standards to land more diverse roles. Instead, a straight actor was cast in a role that could have been a perfect fit for a queer actor looking to break free from the limitations of typecasting, highlighting the continued exclusion of gay performers from such high-profile roles, even when the character itself is inherently gay.
Even more frustrating is the fact that this series was created by Ryan Murphy, an openly gay television writer who has previously cast straight actors in gay roles. This contradiction feels especially disheartening, given that there are plenty of talented queer actors who deserve the opportunity to portray these characters.
The Lack of LGBTQ+ Representation Behind the Scenes
The casting of straight actors in gay roles raises a critical question: Is it appropriate for non-queer performers to take on LGBTQ+ characters? While this debate often centers around whether actors can convincingly portray characters outside their own experiences, there’s a deeper issue at play—LGBTQ+ representation, not just on screen, but behind the scenes.
As noted in a 2022 Refinery29 article, the debate isn’t about an actor's ability to perform, but rather the authenticity that comes with lived experience. Actors can certainly embody roles that don’t reflect their personal lives, but the complexities of marginalized groups often mean that those who share an identity with a character can bring a level of nuance and depth that might be missing when someone outside that experience takes on the role.
Leo Sheng, an openly trans and queer actor known for his role in The L Word: Generation Q, emphasizes the importance of lived experience in crafting compelling performances. While he acknowledges that actors often play characters vastly different from themselves, he finds that when a performer shares an identity with their character, it adds a unique dimension to their portrayal.
However, Sheng also points out that while LGBTQ+ characters are becoming more visible on screen, this progress isn't mirrored behind the scenes. Queer people are still underrepresented in writing rooms, production teams, and other key creative positions, which raises several questions.
- Are LGBTQ+ individuals leading these stories?
- Are they the ones writing, producing, and casting the projects?
- And if a queer person isn’t in charge, are the right choices being made in casting?
Without queer individuals in positions of power, there is a risk of these stories being told through a lens that doesn't fully understand or capture their depth, leading to portrayals that may fall short of true authenticity.
Quiet Barriers for Queer Actors
There’s an argument that restricting straight actors from playing LGBTQ+ roles could inadvertently limit opportunities for queer and trans actors to take on straight or cisgender characters. Critics of such a stance worry that if Hollywood is pressured to cast LGBTQ+ individuals in every queer role, the industry may become reluctant to create more LGBTQ+ content at all, fearing backlash over casting choices. Others suggest that a strict "all-or-nothing" approach could emerge, where straight actors are excluded from playing LGBTQ+ characters, and queer actors are similarly restricted from portraying straight roles.
Jasmine Johnson, senior vice president of development at Crypt TV, highlights a crucial aspect of this debate: While the conversation often centers on whether straight actors should play LGBTQ+ roles, there is a noticeable absence of dialogue about why queer actors aren’t being allowed to play roles outside of their queerness. Straight actors have long been cast in queer roles, but LGBTQ+ actors face a barrier when it comes to portraying characters who are straight. As Johnson points out, queer actors simply aren't given the same opportunities to play roles that are not tied to their sexuality, despite the longstanding practice of straight actors playing LGBTQ+ characters.
This imbalance underscores a deeper issue within the industry: queer actors are often boxed into roles that reflect their identity, while straight actors are free to explore a wider range of characters. This unequal distribution of opportunities speaks to the broader challenge of ensuring that LGBTQ+ performers have the same chances to diversify their careers and be cast in complex, varied roles.
Even with evolving conversations around representation, queer actors still face significant barriers when it comes to casting. One major challenge is that many LGBTQ+ actors are not out publicly or are still figuring out their own identities. This complicates the process, as casting directors cannot ask about an actor's sexuality directly, as doing so could be seen as discriminatory, even if their intentions are supportive.
Jacqueline Toboni, who stars alongside Leo Sheng on The L Word: Generation Q, points out the difficulty this creates. Actors are often left to self-disclose their identities, which, for many, is not always a safe or comfortable choice. This is particularly challenging for actors who may fear professional or personal repercussions for coming out, which can prevent LGBTQ+ talent from being visible in the first place.
Another ongoing issue is the casting of cisgender actors in transgender roles. While some portrayals have been praised for their performances, the practice remains controversial, as it often excludes transgender actors from opportunities that are crucial for visibility and authentic representation. For a deeper dive into the impact of such portrayals, the documentary Disclosure: Trans Lives on Screen on Netflix explores the history of transgender representation in Hollywood and its real-world consequences.
Ultimately, as discussed in the Refinery29 article, the process of casting LGBTQ+ characters should be part of a broader, more thoughtful conversation about authenticity and the responsibility to represent the community genuinely. Producers and executives must consider whether they are truly reflecting the lived experiences of LGBTQ+ people or if they are perpetuating harmful stereotypes. This shift requires intentionality at every level of production, from writing and direction to casting, to ensure that the representation is both accurate and meaningful.
Straight Actors in Queer Roles: The Disparity of Opportunity
When you think about out gay actors in Hollywood, you might be able to name a few and recall the roles they've played. However, it's important to consider whether these actors have had the chance to play both gay and straight characters, like Matt Bomer, or if they primarily portray LGBTQ+ roles. For many queer actors, opportunities outside of their sexuality are limited.
This disparity is highlighted by an IMDb page listing straight actors who have taken on gay roles. First created in 2016 and updated in 2023, the list includes 208 straight actors who have played LGBTQ+ characters, including Robin Williams, Heath Ledger, Jake Gyllenhaal, Tom Hanks, Charlize Theron, and Meryl Streep.
This long list of straight performers highlights a glaring issue: essentially, 208 opportunities have been taken away from LGBTQ+ actors, who are often pigeonholed into playing characters that reflect their sexuality, while straight actors are given a broader range of roles, including those that should rightfully belong to queer performers.
It's not about calling out or “canceling” these actors; rather, the focus is on the larger pattern of missed opportunities for queer talent. These roles represent more than just performances; they are chances for LGBTQ+ actors to expand their careers and challenge the stereotypes that often confine them.
The Financial Success of LGBTQ+ Films Lacking Queer Representation
Gay Times published a list of the 10 most financially successful LGBTQ+ films in history, a ranking that reflects the increasing visibility of LGBTQ+ stories in mainstream cinema. However, an interesting pattern emerges when you take a closer look at these films.
While these movies have achieved significant box office success, most of them feature straight actors in leading roles, including Bohemian Rhapsody (2018), Rocketman (2019), Brokeback Mountain (2005), The Birdcage (1996), and The Imitation Game (2014), with straight actors like Rami Malek, Taron Egerton, Heath Ledger, and Matt Damon portraying LGBTQ+ characters.
Out of the 10 films listed, the only one that prominently featured a queer actor was The Birdcage (1996), with Nathan Lane playing a central role. This list highlights a striking reality: some of the highest-grossing LGBTQ+ films—stories meant to represent the LGBTQ+ community—have primarily been led by straight actors, leaving queer performers largely absent from these financially successful portrayals of their own stories.
The Complexities of LGBTQ+ Representation in Media
The issue of LGBTQ+ representation in Hollywood is undeniably complex. Many actors who have portrayed gay characters in the past did so before the current conversations about representation and authenticity were being widely discussed. Shows like Queer as Folk and Will & Grace in the late '90s and early 2000s were groundbreaking in their depiction of openly gay characters on television, yet the majority of their cast members were straight. While these shows were pivotal in advancing LGBTQ+ visibility, it's important to recognize that the landscape of representation was vastly different at the time, and the conversations we’re having today were not yet in full swing.
Now, in 2025, these conversations about representation have evolved, and the industry must consider who is telling queer stories. Are queer writers and producers at the helm? Are queer actors being given the opportunity to portray LGBTQ+ roles? These questions are essential as we continue to push for more authentic and inclusive representation.
As highlighted in a 2021 Out article, while we’ve made progress in showcasing LGBTQ+ narratives on screen, many of the most well-known and awarded queer roles are still played by non-queer actors. This discrepancy illustrates that, despite the rise in LGBTQ+ stories, there is still much work to be done. Out actors continue to face limited opportunities compared to their straight counterparts, and true, accurate representation requires more than just visibility—it requires access to roles behind the scenes as well.
The industry must move beyond just considering who plays queer characters and look at who is involved in creating these stories. Are the writers, casting directors, and producers reflective of diverse identities, including different sexualities, genders, and races?
Too often, historically, these creative rooms have been dominated by straight, cisgender, white men who may unknowingly create caricatures instead of authentic representations. For true inclusivity, we need diverse voices in every stage of production, ensuring that LGBTQ+ narratives are told by those who have lived them, resulting in more accurate, authentic, and empowering portrayals. Looking to the future, we have the opportunity to advocate for a more inclusive industry where LGBTQ+ creators and actors can thrive, shaping representation that truly reflects the richness of our community.
And remember. Every day is all we have, so you've got to make your own happiness.
For more information on this topic, listen to Episode 55. Gay for Pay: Should Straight Actors Play Queer Characters?
Tune into your favorite podcast player every Tuesday for new episodes of A Jaded Gay.
